Everything that linguists have always wanted to know about logic — but were ashamed to ask
McClure, S. M., Laibson, D., Loewenstein, G., & Cohen, J. D. 2004. Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science, 306, 503–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1100907.
Science
McGinn, C. 2012. Truth by analysis: Games, names, and philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Truth by analysis: Games, names, and philosophy
McNeil, B. J., Pauker, S. G., Sox, H. C., Jr., & Tversky, A. 1982. On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. New England Journal of Medicine, 306, 1259–62. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198205273062103.
New England Journal of Medicine
Meehl, P. E. 1954/2013. Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Brattleboro, VT: Echo Point Books.
Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence.
Mellers, B. A., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. 2001. Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12, 269–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350.
Psychological Science
Mellers, B. A., Ungar, L., Baron, J., Ramos, J., Gurcay, B., et al. 2014. Psychological strategies for winning a geopolitical forecasting tournament. Psychological Science, 25, 1106–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524255.
Psychological Science
Mercier, H. 2020. Not born yesterday: The science of who we trust and what we believe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Not born yesterday: The science of who we trust and what we believe
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. 2011. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 57–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1000968.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. 2017. The enigma of reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
The enigma of reason. Cambridge
Mercier, H., Trouche, E., Yama, H., Heintz, C., & Girotto, V. 2015. Experts and laymen grossly underestimate the benefits of argumentation for reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 21, 341–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2014.981582.