9. Harriet Alexander, ‘False abuse claims are the new court weapon, retiring judge says’, The Sydney Morning Herald, 6 July 2013.

10. F. M. Horwill, ‘The outcome of custody cases in the Family Court of Australia’, Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 1979, 17(2), pp. 31–40.

11. Colin James, Winners and Losers: The father factor in Australian child custody law, Australia and New Zealand Law and History Society E-Journal, 2005, citing the following papers: F. M. Horwill & Bordow, The Outcome of Defended Custody Cases in the Family Court of Australia, Research Report No. 4, Sydney: Family Court of Australia, 1983. In the United States: P. M. Doyle and W. A. Caron, ‘Contested custody intervention: An empirical assessment’ in D. H. Olson et al. (eds) Child Custody: Literature Review and Alternative Approaches, St Paul, MN: Hennepin County Domestic Relations Division, 1979; Weitzman and Dixon, ‘Child custody awards: Legal standards and empirical patterns for child custody, support and visitation after divorce’, 1979, 12 UC Davis L Rev 473; in the United Kingdom: J. Eekelaar and Clive, with K. Clarke & S. Raikes, Custody after Divorce: The disposition of custody in divorce cases in Great Britain, 1977, Oxford, Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, 1977; S. Maidment, Child Custody: What chance for fathers? London: National Council for One Parent Families, 1981.

12. The Sydney Morning Herald, 5 July 1984, as cited in Colin James, ‘Media, men and violence in Australian divorce’, Alternative Law Journal, 2006, 31(1).

13. ‘Family courts – Too much of a revolution?’ The Bulletin, 17 July 1984, cited in James, ‘Media, men and violence’.

14. The Sydney Morning Herald, 9 July 1984, cited in James, ‘Media, men and violence’.

15. Helen Rhoades, ‘Posing as reform: The case of the Family Law Reform Act’, Australian Journal of Family Law, 2000, 14(2), pp. 142, 156.